Each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, at least 1.7 million adults in the U.S. develop the condition. Sepsis, the body’s exaggerated response to infection, can cause widespread inflammation and organ failure. Identifying patients most at risk has relied on a clinician’s own discretion and experience treating sepsis.
Researchers at the University of Florida have created and are using a diagnostic tool that leverages artificial intelligence to identify a patient’s likelihood of developing sepsis — and how severe it will be — as soon as 12 hours after their hospital admission.
The research, published on Tuesday in JAMA Network Open, evaluates and describes the tool that relies on an algorithm that helps practitioners quickly discern which patients are most at risk.
“There is no consistent way of recognizing and triaging critically ill patients when they’re admitted to the ICU,” said Lyle L. Moldawer, Ph.D., director of the Sepsis and Critical Illness Research Center, and emeritus director of the UF Laboratory of Inflammation Biology and Surgical Science. “While this may not pose a problem at large academic institutions with dedicated specialists, it can be harder for places where tertiary care is less developed.”
In the event that sepsis is not recognized early and managed promptly, septic shock ensues, resulting in multiple organ failure and death.
Of those who survive sepsis, only half will completely recover. The rest will either die within one year or be encumbered by long-term disabilities, according to the WHO.
The earlier sepsis is detected, the greater the likelihood of a full recovery. Rapid determination and early intervention is the key to treating it, Moldawer said.
“The worst thing you can do is have a patient sit in the ICU for 72 hours or even 96 hours without an intervention,” he said.
Clinicians who treat critically ill patients must contend with two questions, Moldawer said. Will the patient have a difficult clinical trajectory, requiring more aggressive interventions and supervision? And, if that’s the case — how can we determine the best type of treatment uniquely suited to them?
“Sepsis is a very heterogeneous disease,” said Scott Brakenridge, first author and currently a trauma surgeon at the University of Washington. “People’s immune systems react in different ways to infection and display different levels of illness. In fact, one of the main reasons that finding effective therapeutics to treat sepsis has been so challenging is due to this variation among patients.”
Physiological responses to sepsis run the gamut. Someone can be septic from something as simple as a urinary tract infection, receive antibiotics and be discharged within three days. Another patient with the same diagnosis can go down a much more clinically complex path due to things like age, disease history and comorbidities.
This tool also lends a precision medicine perspective, allowing clinicians to tailor their care to the individual and the drugs they will respond best to before it’s too late.
“Some critically ill patients have an exaggerated inflammatory response and would benefit from steroids or anti-inflammatories,” Moldawer said. “Others may have a tendency toward immune suppression, and require a different approach.”
The algorithm researchers developed marks an instance where technology can better identify how patients’ genetics can influence their response to treatment plans, and has more than halved the time it takes doctors to get information they need to make decisions before it’s too late.
“There will be genomic diagnostic devices that we’ll be able to use right at the bedside in the hospital very soon,” Brakenridge said. “This is really the first time that we’ve been able to move genomic technology to a point-of-care application and take something very exciting at the scientific bench, translate it into a highly insightful biologic metric, and see it used in patients.”
Now researchers expect to continue their quest to bring sepsis research into the fold of precision medicine.
“In many ways, the past decade has been spent trying to personalize approaches to how we treat and respond to sepsis,” Moldawer said. “It’s a great feeling to see it coming together, and even better knowing we’re just getting started.”